THE CONFERENCE THAT WIDENED THE PICTURE

The FACO conference, the Colorado Wildland Fire Conference, ran a full week. The first few days included workshops on how to actually run an ambassador program — the nuts and bolts, taught by FACO to a room full of coordinators. Some had been doing this for years. Some were brand new, still finding their footing. We sat in, learning alongside them.

Talking to people between sessions, we noticed a pattern in how conversations went. After explaining what we do, more than once, the first reaction was to assume we were trying to do the community engagement ourselves, i.e. organize people, and run outreach. We'd have to clarify: no, we're not a program, instead we are trying to build the infrastructure underneath it, for the people already doing that work. Once that landed, the conversation usually opened up.

On that first day of workshops, something deeply changed our understanding of the ecosystem. The sessions that day went deep on Community Wildfire Protection Plans, or CWPPS. They had come up during the seven interviews. But this was the first time we heard the entire story, and for the rest of the days, CWPPS were always referenced as a starting point.

CWPPS are a critical first step in a wholistic approach to fire mitigation: They are put together for the entire municipality, and increasingly are required for accessing funds. They can vary greatly, i.e. some are thick, professionally written documents years in the making, covering hundreds of pages, others much thinner, built by people from the community. A CWPP isn't background paperwork. It's the plan everything else in a community's wildfire response gets built from.

FACO's Becca showed us a graphic her team uses to explain this — a wheel, with "fire adapted communities" in the center, and around it, nine sectors a CWPP might address, depending on what a community actually needs: Safety and evacuation; Public health; Policy and regulation. Not every plan touches every sector. A community builds the plan around what's already in place and what's missing.

An ambassador program, we realized, is just one way a CWPP gets implemented. It's the boots-on-the-ground piece. A plan might also call for contractors, engineers, policy work, all sorts of expertise. Ambassadors are how a community handles the sectors that need people talking to their neighbors, bringing aware, convincing them of taking certain actions. Once a coordinator knows what their wild fire response plan actually calls for, they can build a menu of ambassador opportunities. Not every ambassador does everything. Some ambassadors just want to share information. Others want to do full assessments. The CWPP plan comes first. The menu grows out of it.

So, the workshops gave us the bigger picture where an ambassador program fits in. The rest of the week showed us why community engagement mattered to the people living it. There were dedicated sessions where ambassadors themselves stood up and walked through their work in detail — what a project actually looked like, the back and forth, what it took to get a homeowner to say yes. But just as often, the same kind of story came out over lunch, or standing around between sessions, someone describing a project because someone else asked. It became one of the more noticeable things about the whole week: people were genuinely eager to hear how other programs worked, and just as eager to tell their own story. More than one coordinator, we learned, had started out as an ambassador themselves before taking on the larger role.

Insurance came up too, and it added an emotional layer to everything we'd been hearing. Homeowners can be reluctant to share details about their property, worried that more information means higher premiums or a denied claim. But one insurance industry speaker offered a striking counterpoint: insurers already have so little visibility into individual homes that almost nothing a homeowner could share would make things worse. If anything, mapping a property's risk before a fire, not after, is exactly the kind of information the industry says it wants. This was a reminder that fire mitigation isn't just a technical problem; it's a trust problem, and trust is exactly what an ambassador, standing in your yard, is there to build.

We left with a much bigger map of the community engagement landscape than we'd arrived with, and a clearer sense of where on it we actually belonged. We had enough, finally, to start envisioning a solution.

Next: putting together a solution — how a rough idea turned into something coordinators and ambassadors could actually use.


Previous
Previous

PUTTING TOGETHER A SOLUTION

Next
Next

SEVEN CONVERSATIONS THAT SHAPED WHAT WE BUILT